Roland Emmerich’s apocalyptic film proves relentless destruction on an epic scale can be entertaining fun.
2012 is a 2009 American science fiction disaster film directed, and co-written by Roland Emmerich. It stars John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt, Thandie Newton, Danny Glover, and Woody Harrelson.
2012 is not great, sophisticated filmmaking of the sort that wins awards, what it is, is a relentless barrage, a CGI frenzy of images that depicts destruction on an epic scale. We’re talking destruction of biblical proportions, old testament style, brought to life for entertainment, and entertaining it is.
This film seems like Emmerich is attempting to do an improved, and a better tribute, that is more epic in scope, to the disaster movies of the past bringing to mind the films of Irwin Allen, and the all-star ensemble movies of the fifties and sixties, and he mostly succeeds.
I enjoyed this movie and will attempt to explain why, and what I like about this film in the next few paragraphs
2012 is pure escapism in film form that is sometimes dazzling in its portrayal of the end of the world, and visually, it’s a hell of a show. Intellectual engagement is almost always something I require to enjoy a film, but sometimes a wild ride can be just as satisfying. This movie is a hoot, and although it got mixed reviews, it’s a film I always enjoy whenever I watch it again. It’s one of my favorite guilty pleasures. The story, of course, is based on the discovery of an ancient Mayan calendar that abruptly ends with the year of the movie’s title, that some have translated as meaning said calendar predicts the end of the world.
The movie starts out with a visit with some scientists, who have discovered there’s something unprecedented going on. Violent solar storms have caused neutrinos to mutate into particles with mass, and they are behaving like microwaves, and heating the earth’s core, freeing the earth’s mantle to shift. Combined with a planetary alignment this spells doom for humanity and marks the end of the world as we know it.
This preface spins out just enough well-spun science gobbledygook to give what follows credibility. What follows is a procession of violent geological events that will leave the world transformed in a manner it has never experienced before.
Amidst the chaos that ensues, the film narrows its focus on the stories of just a few people going through this planet-wide event, and by doing that it succeeds in giving the story a human face and, makes it more relatable. A big part of the reason this movie is enjoyable is its cast, and the character’s they portray. The characters in the film are the source of the humor and drama that take turns making the film as entertaining as it is.
Emmerich has a real talent for bringing out and focusing on the human elements in his films; and is one of the main reasons his well-known film Independence Day (aka ID4 – 1996), works as well as it does. He pulls out every piece of cornball stuff he can, and for the most part, he makes it work. Within the context of the dark and grim events of this film are themes about human nature, and a reminder that life goes on, no matter what. It’s pure corn, but sometimes corn is good.
Some subplots mostly serve as a way to introduce these characters and the roles they play in the story the film tells. The film becomes a thrill ride of special effects, depicting a procession of by the skin-of-their-teeth narrow escapes that emphasize the danger, and destruction that almost seems to follow the people that are trying to avoid it. As in any odyssey, we meet a lot of individuals along the way that do not survive the trip.
Along the way we learn about a top-secret plan to deal with events like these, should they occur. Of course, this is something put in place for the privileged rich and powerful to take advantage of, and everyone else is on their own. This revelation adds a needed science fiction element to the story that rescues it from being a pointless CGI exercise in pure destruction, and a race against time with little chance of survival. It adds the possibility of relief and a chance for survival from the otherwise inescapable destruction hounding the survivors.
As this part of the narrative develops it reveals there are some massive ships in China, arks built to save and preserve parts of the world deemed significant enough to qualify. Things like great works of art and even some animal species are shown being given a spot on these arks. It’s an attempt not just to save the best of humanity, but to save as much as possible of the entire world and all of its biodiversity. All this is waiting for those lucky enough to have a seat.
There is also an element of class warfare introduced towards the end of the film, and it segues temporarily into a philosophical discussion about what makes us human and helps emphasize the human aspect of the story.
So, in its final stages, this story becomes the old story of technology vs. nature. This time around, despite nature scoring a TKO, it ends with a beaten human race limping home, having learned some tough lessons, with a chance to start over again, and finishes on a note of hope for the future, and an opportunity for a new beginning.
I would have to agree with a lot of critics, this is not film making’s finest hour, but it is a very entertaining movie, and a lot of fun for when you happen to be in the mood for some relentless, mindless destruction on a level that spells the end of the world. It’s a hell of a show.