|
| ||||
LORD OF THE RINGS: THE TWO TOWERS
* * * ½ STARRING:
Elijah Wood, Ian McKellen, Viggo Mortensen, Sean Astin, Billy Boyd, Liv Tyler, John Rhys-Davies, Dominic Monaghan, Christopher Lee, Miranda Otto, Brad Dourif, Orlando Bloom
Imagine trying to release a movie last year this time with the title The Two Towers (so soon after the 11 September 2001 attack on the
World Trade Centre)! I wonder if the studios would have actually changed the
title in such an event? Or maybe have moved the release date? Well, if they
had changed the title, it wouldn't have come as too big a surprise
because so far this hugely popular movie series has taken quite a lot of
liberties with the original source material. Tolkien groupies be damned, but
I can't ever remember the books ever being this action filled!
The Hollywood action movie retelling of Tolkien's stodgy fantasy tome
continues with this latest middle instalment that clocks in at three
hours, pretty much like the first movie. Not that I ever finished the
books to be honest, but I remember entire extended action sequences in the
previous Fellowship of the Ring movie only being a paragraph or so in the
original text. Nor can I remember there being so many women in the books
either.
"Much more action-packed and spectacular than the previous movie,
its centrepiece being a viscerally thrilling and grandiose battle
scene . . ." No matter. Next year will see the saga end with Return of the King,
which will no doubt be yet another three hour epic. As the middle segment,
The Two Towers ends up a bit like that that other well-known middle segment
movie from another well-known fantasy trilogy The Empire Strikes
Back. It
is quite unpredictable (like I said: I never finished the books - life is
too short) and one has a hard time keeping track of the time. The movie is over almost before one can
catch one's bearings. The three hours running
time seemed to pass a lot faster than the original movie's. Or maybe it
was the comfier seats and leg space in the cinema I watched it in this
time around . . .
Point remains that
Two Towers is much more action-packed and
spectacular than the previous movie. Its centrepiece is a viscerally
thrilling and grandiose battle scene that makes previous battle scenes
such as those seen in Braveheart seem like schoolyard squabbles. Unlike
most of today's movies, the computer-generated effects in this sequence
doesn't look like something out of a Sony PlayStation (go check those The Mummy
movies and some of the worst bits from the latest Bond movie, Die Another
Day again). Two Towers should be seen on the big screen: by the end of it
you'll feel a bit pummelled by the camerawork and the sound, but you'll
find yourself wishing that it's December 2003 already so that you can go
see the last instalment even if it is just for a sense of closure. Some random notes on the movie: it is not without its faults however.
The tree creatures that, er, lumbers into sight at about the halfway mark
or so seems as if they just walked in from The Never-Ending Story or some
other mid-1980s bad fantasy flick. Also, the movie's ideological roots
(groan!) are even more apparent with this subplot. The bad guys led by Sauron represent modernity and industrialisation: they hack down forests
to make way for factories. Or maybe they're just Republicans, who knows?
But it becomes obvious why the books were so popular with environmentally-minded hippies in the 1960s. However, if Sauron happens to have discovered
shampoo and nailbrushes I would have wholeheartedly supported him! Middle
Earth must have the dirtiest long hair and filthy finger nails I have seen
since either grunge, The 13th Warrior or, erm, the
hippies themselves . . . Followed by the last instalment,
Lord of the Rings: Return of the King in
2003.
Click
here to receive our free weekly e-mail newsletter.
|
|
|||