HARRY POTTER AND THE PRISONER
OF AZKABAN
  
STARRING:
Alan Rickman, Daniel Radcliffe, David Thewlis, Emma Watson, Gary Oldman,
Maggie Smith, Michael Gambon, Robbie Coltrane, Rupert Grint
2004, 135 Minutes, Directed by: Alfonso Cuaron
Description:
For twelve long years, the dread fortress of Azkaban held an infamous
prisoner named Sirius Black. Convicted of killing thirteen people with a
single curse, he was said to be the heir apparent to the Dark Lord,
Voldemort. Now he has escaped, leaving only two clues as to where he might
be headed: Harry Potter's defeat of You-Know-Who was Black's downfall as
well. And the Azkaban guards heard Black muttering in his sleep, "He's at
Hogwarts...he's at Hogwarts." Harry Potter isn't safe, not even within the
walls of his magical school, surrounded by his friends. Because on top of
it all, there may well be a traitor in their midst . . .
—
Amazon.com
After some initial wariness I’ve finally started to come
round to the Harry Potter movies. They’re not as clever as everyone
says and, more importantly, they’re not quite as clever as they think they
are. I have a good friend whose wife is a big fan of the Potter
books. He’s been reading twenty-volume science-fiction novels for the
better part of his life and every time it’s implied that J.K. Rowling
invented this technique with Harry Potter you can see a dull irritation
cloud his eyes. But the Potter movies have an endearing and
light-hearted spirit of whimsy from which a certain other, recent fantasy
trilogy—more overwrought, overlong, and overrated—could have greatly
benefited.
I’m sure plenty of parents felt compelled to cover the ears
of their children when it was announced that Chris Columbus, who directed
the first two Potter films (The Sorcerer’s Stone and The
Chamber of Secrets), would be replaced by Mexican director Alfonse
Cuaron for Prisoner of Azkaban. Columbus is known for family
favorites like Home Alone, while Cuaron came to fame two years ago
with the R—or was it NC17?—rated Y Tu Mama Tambien, you know, the
one where the guy and the girl and the other guy go on the road trip, and
then there’s a bit too much hoochie-coochie.
But, really, he’s the right man for the job, for two
reasons. First: wasn’t Y Tu Mama about two teenage guys and a woman
discovering themselves? Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) and his two best friends
Hermione and Ron (Emma Watson and Rupert Grint) are about 13 now. Not only
are the boys starting to really notice the girl for the first time, but
all three of them are becoming wary of traditional ideas of authority.
Cuaron reaches past all the magic and special effects and shows three
teens gradually becoming disillusioned by the establishment and realizing
that their elders were once as young and as stupid as they are. And maybe
their elders are still just as dumb.
To this end, the students at Hogwarts are portrayed with
untucked shirts, rolled up sleeves, and loosened neckties, and Harry seems
to be suffering from a perpetual bad hair day. He’s grumpy and given to
bursts of anger, while Ron and Hermione bicker about their pets an awful
lot. The scene where the boys take turns with magic tablets, just for
laughs, is framed and acted as if they’re passing around a doobie, and
when we first join Harry, he’s hiding under the sheets in his bed, playing
with his magic wand. The boyish adventure of the first two films has
happily collided with movies like Thirteen and I Capture the
Castle.
"Introduces ethnic minorities to Hogwarts, creating the
impression that we are in modern England instead of 1935 . . ." |
The
second reason Cuaron is the right director is, well, he’s just a better
director than Chris Columbus. Those familiar with Y Tu Mama will
remember how long many of his individual takes are; dialogue scenes are
unbroken by cuts, allowing them to build up momentum and rhythm. The
Prisoner of Azkaban follows this same pattern, and we feel more of
Harry and the kids are being revealed when we don’t cut away to something
else, or when the foreground doesn’t have to be cluttered with effects.
Cuaron also has some athletic fun flying through mirrors and out windows,
but this trickery tends to only bookend dialogue scenes, and is not an end
in itself.
But onto the summary: a parallel world exists to our own,
run by wizards, witches, and magicians. The training ground for their kind
is the school of Hogwarts, and the brightest, and also most troubled
student at the school is Harry. An orphan whose parents were killed by an
evil wizard, he is perpetually trying to unravel the mystery of their
murder, and navigating among professors who know more than they are
telling, and who may even be duplicitous. In this episode, the latest
piece of the puzzle comes when a murdering maniac (the great Gary Oldman,
whose basic mood is anger) escapes from a supposedly-impenetrable magic
prison. Ghastly, flying prison guards known as Dementers surround Hogwarts
to await his inevitable arrival. Haunted houses, secret passages,
werewolves, time travel, griffins, shape-shifting rodentia, and British
actors spitting out threats, accusations, and plot points with perfect
Shakespearean enunciation ensue.
There’s a routine to the Potter films, in which the
long, long first act is spent on build-up, on guns put on mantles but
never fired, and on members of the enormous British supporting cast
alluding to things from Harry’s past which are too horrible to speak of
openly. There are some tedious bits in which Harry’s aunt, uncle, and
school enemies hate him feverishly without much motivation, and, in much
the same that movie cops are always one step away from losing their badges
or “riding a desk,” Harry is always a hair’s breadth away from expulsion.
As in the previous films, characters introduced as trustworthy end up
hiding something, and the initial villain is a red herring. Columbus, in
his reverence of the books, plays all this straight, while Cuaron realizes
the Encyclopedia Brown/Nancy Drew silliness of it all and introduces a
little gentle mocking and exaggeration. There are several instances of “I
bet that made more sense in the book,” and if someone like Terry Gilliam
or Tim Burton was at the helm, the exaggeration level would be so high
that the absence of sense would turn into its own kind of sense. That
would be cool.
Cuaron
also introduces ethnic minorities to Hogwarts, creating the impression
that we are in modern England, full of blacks, Indians, and Pakistanis,
instead of 1935. This will no doubt allow the series, which has always
availed itself of Britain’s finest actors, to eventually include the two
sisters from Bend It Like Beckham as upperclassmen who say “bugger”
a lot while smoking cigarettes behind the castle. Prisoner of Azkaban’s
latest additions include a bug-eyed and scenery-munching performance by
Emma Thompson (Sense and Sensibility) as a daffy teacher of
divination. Her ex-husband Kenneth Branagh was a charlatan in the
previous film; I guess being a big phony is always alluring for
classically trained thespians.
In my limited exposure to the outside world, I have
detected none of the criticisms that the previous films and books accrued
from certain Christian groups claiming that children shouldn’t be watching
and reading about black magic. Magic in the Potter universe is
treated like a tool, to be learned and mastered like any other skill, not
involving prayer or meditation. Why Potter’s non-religious magic
would come under fire while The Force, which does actually ring of
religion, goes unnoticed, is beyond me. Wiccans, i.e. genuine
practitioners of witchcraft, who can easily explain the origin of the
flying broomstick misconception, have much more right to be offended. But
because Harry Potter is intended for mass, worldwide consumption,
no one in it has a particular religion. It should be noted that Harry’s
friend Ron is picked on by English kids, has red hair, and comes from a
big, generous family of innumerable siblings. If that isn’t movie code
for an Irish Catholic, I don’t know what is.
But I digress. This is a fun, beautifully made film, with
a great supporting cast and the same wonderful production values as its
two predecessors. The result is characters we care about in exciting,
intriguing situations, filled with color and brilliance. As children, we
may not have been betrayed as badly as Harry and his friends sometimes
are, but we remember the sting of parents turning out to be fallible and
adults siding with the rules instead of with us, and we remember giving up
those illusions. We may not believe in magic or in griffins, but the
capital-T Truth Cuaron has brought to the series is sound. What more do
you want from a summer movie?
-
The Friday &
Saturday Night Critic
|