<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small Role for Harrison Ford in Blade Runner Sequel?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/small-role-for-harrison-ford-in-blade-runner-sequel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/small-role-for-harrison-ford-in-blade-runner-sequel/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=small-role-for-harrison-ford-in-blade-runner-sequel</link>
	<description>daily sci-fi news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seraphina Ramlal</title>
		<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/small-role-for-harrison-ford-in-blade-runner-sequel/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Seraphina Ramlal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/?p=3134#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>Minus all the plot holes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minus all the plot holes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observant</title>
		<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/small-role-for-harrison-ford-in-blade-runner-sequel/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Observant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/?p=3134#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>I actually think Prometheus was a great film, he did state that when he shot the original Alien film he did not intend on the following films to focus on the zenomorphs as the franchise ended up doing. Kudos to Scott for &quot;taking back&quot; his original ideals for the story he started. As for the comparisons with what Lucas took the liberties in doing with his star wars prequels, there isn&#039;t a comparison, two totally different things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think Prometheus was a great film, he did state that when he shot the original Alien film he did not intend on the following films to focus on the zenomorphs as the franchise ended up doing. Kudos to Scott for &#8220;taking back&#8221; his original ideals for the story he started. As for the comparisons with what Lucas took the liberties in doing with his star wars prequels, there isn&#8217;t a comparison, two totally different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/small-role-for-harrison-ford-in-blade-runner-sequel/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/?p=3134#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>Was I imagining things or was there not a twist to the story in which the female replicant didn&#039;t have a replicant&#039;s usual short lifespan? And I also thought the implication was that Deckard might be a replicant with a similar gift. The whole idea that Deckard might be a replicant was dumb. That is, The way it was tossed out there and not developed sucked. It just did. It wasn&#039;t interesting.

Blade Runner was awesome of course. Prometheus was a disaster. I have no confidence in Scott. I don&#039;t know what happens to these geniuses. Lucas ruined the Vader character in his prequels, which, otherwise, were great eye candy, which I like. Jackson went too far with King Kong, after his success with the awesome (but not perfect) Lord Of The Rings. Why, why, why?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was I imagining things or was there not a twist to the story in which the female replicant didn&#8217;t have a replicant&#8217;s usual short lifespan? And I also thought the implication was that Deckard might be a replicant with a similar gift. The whole idea that Deckard might be a replicant was dumb. That is, The way it was tossed out there and not developed sucked. It just did. It wasn&#8217;t interesting.</p>
<p>Blade Runner was awesome of course. Prometheus was a disaster. I have no confidence in Scott. I don&#8217;t know what happens to these geniuses. Lucas ruined the Vader character in his prequels, which, otherwise, were great eye candy, which I like. Jackson went too far with King Kong, after his success with the awesome (but not perfect) Lord Of The Rings. Why, why, why?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oquc Vmn Xkz</title>
		<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/small-role-for-harrison-ford-in-blade-runner-sequel/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Oquc Vmn Xkz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/?p=3134#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>Rachel did not have a limited life span </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel did not have a limited life span</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scifimoviepage</title>
		<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/small-role-for-harrison-ford-in-blade-runner-sequel/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>Scifimoviepage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/?p=3134#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>Depends on which version of the movie you watch. In the original theatrical version there is talk of Rachel not having a limited lifespan during the movie&#039;s &quot;happy ending&quot;. In the later &quot;director&#039;s cut&quot; nothing of the sort is implied and the movie ends with Gaff&#039;s famous line of &quot;It&#039;s too bad she won&#039;t live! But then again, who does?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on which version of the movie you watch. In the original theatrical version there is talk of Rachel not having a limited lifespan during the movie&#8217;s &#8220;happy ending&#8221;. In the later &#8220;director&#8217;s cut&#8221; nothing of the sort is implied and the movie ends with Gaff&#8217;s famous line of &#8220;It&#8217;s too bad she won&#8217;t live! But then again, who does?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/small-role-for-harrison-ford-in-blade-runner-sequel/#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator>PAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/?p=3134#comment-1025</guid>
		<description>It is also said that the new type of replicants don´t have this limited life spawn... Rachael i.e.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is also said that the new type of replicants don´t have this limited life spawn&#8230; Rachael i.e.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
