<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six Reasons Why We Liked the Original Conan Flick Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/six-reasons-why-we-liked-the-original-conan-flick-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/six-reasons-why-we-liked-the-original-conan-flick-better/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=six-reasons-why-we-liked-the-original-conan-flick-better</link>
	<description>daily sci-fi news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/six-reasons-why-we-liked-the-original-conan-flick-better/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/?p=636#comment-1075</guid>
		<description> &quot;Modern audiences will probably prefer the action-packed remake to 
the 1982 film, which lacked focus at times and has dated badly in the 
special effects department.&quot;Bullshit. How did the original ever lack focus? It&#039;s the plot in the new one that doesn&#039;t make sense. We all know who Thulsa Doom is, and what his goal is; to subvert and brainwash Hyperborea&#039;s youth into starting a jihad. This new guy? Well, he wants to bring his dead wife back to life so she can use the necromancy of a dead civilization to turn him into a god... yeah, that&#039;s kinda lame. Seriously, the new villain is nothing compared to James Earl Jones and his Tree of Woe line. This new movie sucks compared to the old one; the only actors who were worth a damn were Jason Momoa and Rose McGowen; the rest were just reciting their lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8221;Modern audiences will probably prefer the action-packed remake to<br />
the 1982 film, which lacked focus at times and has dated badly in the<br />
special effects department.&#8221;Bullshit. How did the original ever lack focus? It&#8217;s the plot in the new one that doesn&#8217;t make sense. We all know who Thulsa Doom is, and what his goal is; to subvert and brainwash Hyperborea&#8217;s youth into starting a jihad. This new guy? Well, he wants to bring his dead wife back to life so she can use the necromancy of a dead civilization to turn him into a god&#8230; yeah, that&#8217;s kinda lame. Seriously, the new villain is nothing compared to James Earl Jones and his Tree of Woe line. This new movie sucks compared to the old one; the only actors who were worth a damn were Jason Momoa and Rose McGowen; the rest were just reciting their lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashcraft</title>
		<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/six-reasons-why-we-liked-the-original-conan-flick-better/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>flashcraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/?p=636#comment-673</guid>
		<description>&quot;...all the macho bullshit in the original Conan...&quot;bullshit? What bullshit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;all the macho bullshit in the original Conan&#8230;&#8221;bullshit? What bullshit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/six-reasons-why-we-liked-the-original-conan-flick-better/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 06:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/?p=636#comment-634</guid>
		<description>Maybe in another 30 years they will try again and get it right. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe in another 30 years they will try again and get it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conan</title>
		<link>http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/movies/six-reasons-why-we-liked-the-original-conan-flick-better/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Conan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifimoviepage.com/blog/?p=636#comment-581</guid>
		<description>oh man... this 2011 remake is so bad it hurts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh man&#8230; this 2011 remake is so bad it hurts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
