"'Lord
of the Rings' as War" (cont.)
Jackson’s recklessly irresponsible treatment
of “war-as-video game” would be excusable if he were making juvenile
escapism, like “Star Wars” or “Indiana Jones.” While the completely
reformed city would be an acceptable and even admirable stunt to pull at
the end of “Star Wars,” with its tone of whimsy, it is harder to tolerate
in a supposedly serious, “meaningful” film like “Lord of the
Rings.” The trilogy certainly wants us to believe
it is genuinely meaningful, with its freakish length, pompous music, and
dour, humorless dialogue. Whether “LOTR” means anything or is
infuriating adolescent escapism trying to pass itself off as something
grander is up for debate. James O’Ehley
writes:
“Like the books, the film is really largely a
humourless affair; its own sense of seriousness and inflated worth drags
it down. How many times can one listen to actors in tights and pointy ear
make-up spout pseudo-Shakespearean dialogue without wanting to
chuckle? Leave all notions of irony at the cinema entrance . .
.”
Concealing the silly as serious is an
accusation which could not easily be levied at the works of George Lucas,
who is an avid student of pulp, who knows to be wary of running past the
two-hour mark, and who has cheerfully marketed “Star Wars”
cookbooks. Perhaps the pendulum has swung and the winking
self-deprecation that sneaks into the “Star Wars” films is going out of
fashion, and we want our pulp to be humorless in its seriousness (how much
money did “Spider-man” make?). It’s worth
mentioning that for all the pro-war attitudes that can be found in both
Middle-Earth and a galaxy far, far away, Luke Skywalker’s crowning moment
in “Star Wars” is when he throws down his weapon in the face of evil, a
sentiment never mirrored in “Lord of the Rings.”
There are, of
course, exceptions. The coda in “Return of the King”—whose length
and continual fake-outs did not bother me, but whose soppiness did—shows
Frodo, Sam, and the Other Two as having been distinctly jarred by
bloodshed from their previous place in society. But these instances
are few and far between.